Search for: "In Re: Automotive Professionals, Inc."
Results 1 - 20
of 26
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Apr 2023, 8:05 am
BONUS 2: Barz Adventures Inc. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 6:36 am
And now we're witnessing an all-out Avanci v. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 12:50 pm
Defense-Oriented Decisions Dominated 2010's Biggest Non-Automotive Casesby Daniel E. [read post]
7 Sep 2019, 2:13 am
Avanci et al. case) to a couple of cases in which Continental AG, the German parent company of Michigan-based Continental Automotive Systems, allegedly "prevailed on the argument that it cannot be served through [Continental Automotive Systems, Inc.] [read post]
5 Oct 2019, 11:09 am
Sceptre, Inc. in the Central District of California, to a 1999 decision by the FTC (In Re Summit Technology, Inc.), and a DOJ paper according to which certain pool agreements require antitrust scrutiny. [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 11:59 am
Several Rules of Professional Conduct appear relevant, including 5.5-5.7. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 6:15 am
On Friday, Nokia obtained an additional anti-antisuit-injunction injunction ("AAII") against Continental AG, the German parent company of the automotive supplier group, but meanwhile it has become known that the prior AAII, entered in July against Michigan-based Continental Automotive Systems, Inc., was finally served under the Hague Convention "[o]n or about August 28," i.e., Wednesday. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 9:36 pm
They still appear to feel they're in a very strong position on contract law. [read post]
26 Oct 2019, 10:58 am
The reason that torpedo tactic worked was simply that Italian courts aren't the fastest ones in Europe, and they're particularly slow when a plaintiff does nothing to speed things up. [read post]
30 Aug 2019, 6:41 am
Last month Nokia had already obtained an against Continental Automotive Systems, Inc. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 8:22 am
ABC Technologies Inc. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 8:22 am
ABC Technologies Inc. [read post]
3 May 2024, 8:38 am
Ripps * You’re a Fool if You Think You Can Win a 512(f) Case–Security Police and Fire Professionals v. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 4:56 am
ComerUPDATE: The South Carolina Supreme Court has re-filed this opinion as of September 13, 2010, and the below brief was based on the first opinion, and not the re-filed one. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 9:17 pm
Honeywell Int’l, Inc., 622 F.3d 1367, 1376 (Fed. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 2:54 pm
He has litigated cases against Intel Corporation, Toyota Motor Sales, USA, Inc., Honda North America, Inc., Aston Martin Lagonda of North America, Inc., BMW of North America, LLC, Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC, Keyes European, LLC, Rusnak Enterprises, LLC and Wells Fargo Auto Finance, Inc. [read post]
Very unsettling 9th Circuit "Betty Boop" decision on copyright and trademark in BETTY BOOP character
23 Feb 2011, 2:29 pm
See Automotive Gold, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 8:03 pm
(ITC Law Blog) US Patents – Decisions District Court S D Florida on motions to stay pending re-examination: Fusilamp LLC v. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 8:22 am
Ripps * You’re a Fool if You Think You Can Win a 512(f) Case–Security Police and Fire Professionals v. [read post]
29 Apr 2023, 7:13 am
April 21, 2023) Prior Posts on Section 512(f) * You’re a Fool if You Think You Can Win a 512(f) Case–Security Police and Fire Professionals v. [read post]
